November 2007

Another example of how this system is screwed up.

So the tories have dumped, for no good reason, two of their duly-nominated candidates in Ontario.This is not a problem limited to t he Tories. This is a problem that exists in all the major parties.Why should you care? Hmm...The laws of Canada are written by the house of commons.Because of the first-past-the-post electoral system, the house of commons is usually controlled by a single party that received only minority support in the election.

Don't Vote!

I just read an interesting post by the guys over at freakonomics, where they talk about the economist's view of voting. It's a waste of time, and many people who would otherwise recognize that do it for reasons that have nothing to do with the result of the vote. That's consistent with the political science experience that there's relatively little you can do to change who people vote for. Easier to change whether or not they vote.

Double Standard on Death

Irwin Cotler has an excellent opinion piece in the Ottawa Citizen today in which he asks the important question:Given Stephen Harper's recent decision that Canada will not seek clemency for Canadians sentenced to death in the United States, and the law that requires us not to extradite US citizens who might face the death penalty in the United States, whence the double-standard?Why do Americans in Canada facing death in the US deserve the full protection of our law, but Canadians facing death in the US do not deserve even a diplomatic clemency request?

We know the difference.

Dear Prime Minister Harper:Allowing Canadians to die at the hands of the US government does not reduce crime.Allowing Afghani detainees to be kept in medieval prisons with sadistic wardens does not reduce terrorism.Putting tougher sentences on particular types of crimes does not reduce the frequency of those crimes.You're not respecting and protecting the rights of Canadians to live in peace and security.You're merely disrespecting and violating the rights of criminals.Canadians know the difference, and they expect better.

Communicating Dion's 30/50 Plan

I think it's great that Dion has a plan for poverty in this country.I don't know why he named it in a way that makes it sound like a Van Halen record, or a life insurance policy.According to Dion's numbers, the plan is to take over 1,000,000 Canadians out of poverty, almost half of whom will be children, in 5 years. Now that's a big deal. But you can't express it that way.

Hidden Agendas

So, the Liberals have a hidden agenda on crime, say the Conservatives.This Press Release proves it. Click there before you read the rest of this post, or the rest of this post won't make any sense.See? Can you see it? It's small. You have to look closely. Right there, above his left eye, just below the hairline, that faint discolouration of the skin? Bam. Hidden agenda.

Aspirational targets

With the result of the election in Australia, Canada is the only nation in the Commonwealth that is opposed to binding climate change emissions targets. The only one.That's a little embarrassing. Why is it the case?Simple. Most people propose binding targets only for developed nations. Harper suggests that it's not fair. He suggests this for two reasons, both of which are valid.

Committee Meetings

When I should be working on my law school assignments, I'm watching the fascinating Ethics Committee meeting with Mr. Schreiber on CPAC.Why are they fascinating? Mr. Schreiber has not really said anything significant, other than the fact that he would have been willing to pay Mulroney another $200,000 on top of the $300,000 he actually received if Mr. Mulroney had actually done anything.